A President’s Role Is to Comfort, Not Divide

Trumps Despicable Response to tragedy is shameful for a President of the United States. This is not a time for blame nor is it a time for politics period. When tragedy strikes, a U.S. president should embody national unity, offering comfort to grieving families and reinforcing a sense of collective resilience. Instead, Donald Trump seized the Washington plane crash as yet another opportunity to stoke division, attack his political opponents, and push his authoritarian vision of a so-called “master race.” His response was not just abnormal—it was disgraceful.

1. The Facade of a Statesman: Trumps Despicable Response

Trump began his press conference with a veneer of solemnity. Dressed in his signature dark blue suit, white shirt, and red tie, he approached the podium with the gravity expected of a leader. He called for a moment of silence, acknowledged the grief of the nation, and praised first responders. For a fleeting moment, he appeared presidential. But…

As quickly as he donned the mask of a statesman, he discarded it. Instead of letting the focus remain on the victims and their families, he launched into a tirade blaming Democratic policies—specifically diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)—for the crash. Without evidence, he claimed that under Barack Obama, air traffic control standards had been lowered, leading to “mediocre” hires who lacked the intelligence to do the job. His underlying message was chilling: Diversity in hiring had supposedly cost American lives. Trumps Despicable Response demonstrates a lack of empathy, an inability to understand the weight of his role at that moment, and autocratic tendencies as he refers to a Master Race.

2. Trumps Despicable Response: Sean Duffy–The Sycophant-in-Chief

Trump’s Transportation Secretary, Sean Duffy, wasted no time parroting his boss’s talking points. After briefly acknowledging the tragedy, he heaped praise on Trump, calling his leadership “remarkable” and claiming his administration was restoring “the best and the brightest” to crucial positions.

Duffy’s performance was a textbook example of political opportunism. Rather than discussing concrete safety reforms, he used the moment to elevate Trump’s brand. His behavior underscored a dangerous reality: In Trump’s administration, unquestioning loyalty mattered far more than actual competence.

3. Pete Hegseth: A Troubled Nominee in Trump’s Inner Circle

If Trump truly valued “the best and the brightest,” his appointment of Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense would be indefensible. Hegseth, a former Fox News host, had a history of alleged domestic violence and alcohol abuse. Yet, in Trump’s eyes, his unwavering loyalty outweighed any personal failings.

Hegseth used the press conference to reinforce Trump’s anti-DEI rhetoric, declaring, “The era of DEI is gone at the Defense Department.” This was not the voice of a leader concerned about military readiness—it was the voice of a political operative toeing the party line. His presence at the press conference highlighted a broader issue: Trump’s administration prioritized ideological purity over qualifications.

4. Trumps Despicable Response: The Fascist Undertones of a “Master Race”

The most disturbing moment came when Trump asserted, “It’s almost as if you need a master race.” His comment, delivered in a chillingly authoritative tone, exposed the underlying logic of his argument. By framing DEI policies as a threat to national security, he was laying the groundwork for a broader attack on the very idea of inclusivity in American society.

This rhetoric is not just dangerous—it echoes authoritarian regimes of the past. A U.S. president should never imply that racial or genetic superiority should determine who holds positions of power. Trump’s statement was a stark reminder of the ideological extremism that underpins his worldview.Trumps Despicable Response opens the door to his true self and that frightens me and it should frighten you as well.

5. Exploiting Tragedy for Political Gain: Trumps Despicable Response

Throughout the press conference, Trump repeatedly dodged questions about evidence linking DEI policies to the crash. When pressed, he sneered, “Because I have common sense, OK?” His dismissal of facts in favor of instinct is a hallmark of his leadership style—one that replaces expertise with arrogance.

Instead of offering meaningful policy solutions, Trump turned a national tragedy into a campaign speech. His response was not about mourning the dead or ensuring future safety; it was about solidifying his base by pushing divisive, race-baiting rhetoric.

Conclusion: A President Unfit for the Office He Holds

A true leader rises above politics in moments of crisis. Trump, however, has shown time and again that he is incapable of restraint. His response to the Washington plane crash was not just inappropriate—it was a disgraceful exploitation of tragedy for political gain.

America deserves a leader who unites rather than divides, who mourns with the grieving rather than weaponizing their pain. Trump’s behavior is not normal. It is dangerous, cynical, and unworthy of the office he holds. Has he no shame? He certainly has no empathy. I have no illusions that Donald Trump does not know what he is doing or saying. To the contrary, his language is intentional, designed to throw people off their game, to disrupt, to create chaos, and to slip through the cracks of disgust that he so proudly wears. There are, however, days I wish he might just shut the fuck up.

Sources Cited

Biden, J. (2020). Promise Me, Dad: A Year of Hope, Hardship, and Purpose. Flatiron Books.

Obama, B. (2006). The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream. Crown.

Reagan, R. (1986). Address to the Nation on the Challenger Disaster. Retrieved from the Reagan Presidential Library.

Trump, D. J. (2024). Remarks on the Washington Plane Crash. White House Press Briefing.

Suggestions for Further Reading

Snyder, T. (2017). On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century. A guide to recognizing authoritarian tactics.

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Examines how democratic institutions are eroded.

Gessen, M. (2020). Surviving Autocracy. A look at how autocrats manipulate power.

Hofstadter, R. (1964). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. Explores conspiracy-driven leadership.

Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to Be an Antiracist. Analyzes systemic racism and its impact on governance.

Dionne, E. J. (2016). Why the Right Went Wrong. Traces the rise of extremism in American conservatism.

Wilkerson, I. (2020). Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. Examines race and power structures in America.

Lipstadt, D. (2019). Antisemitism: Here and Now. Explores modern authoritarian rhetoric.

Applebaum, A. (2020). Twilight of Democracy: The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. A deep dive into authoritarian trends.

 DISCLAIMER: The images on this page, and across the whole blog are created using AI imaging and are intended to illustrate the argument in the post. They are NOT representing real people or events directly, rather the images enhance the argument and nothing more. We do not intend any offense, nor do we wish to single out individuals in any way by the images themselves.

Here are some posts we think you’ll like following this theme

U S International Standing is in Jeopardy: 6 Alluring Reasons Why

Illusion of Truth the Outcome of Chaos Propaganda: 5 Ways Big Lies Shape Common Belief

2 Jan 6th Rioters Reject Pardons: Why Not Trump?